# li-profile Score a LinkedIn profile out of 100 against a 12-part rubric and rewrite the parts that lose points - headline, about, experience, featured, banner. Use when the user says "optimize my profile", "score my LinkedIn", "rewrite my headline", "fix my about section", or pastes their profile and asks how it reads. - **Kind:** skill - **Source:** https://github.com/Jakeschincariol/linkedin-agent-skill - **Page:** https://forefy.com/skills/773c83ff-6ac9-4822-aee3-9875dc1bf417 - **API (JSON + files):** https://forefy.com/api/asr/773c83ff-6ac9-4822-aee3-9875dc1bf417 --- ## SKILL.md --- name: li-profile description: >- Score a LinkedIn profile out of 100 against a 12-part rubric and rewrite the parts that lose points - headline, about, experience, featured, banner. Use when the user says "optimize my profile", "score my LinkedIn", "rewrite my headline", "fix my about section", or pastes their profile and asks how it reads. --- # li-profile A profile is not a resume. A resume answers "what have you done". A profile answers "should I message this person", and it answers it in about four seconds, from the headline and the first two lines of the about. ## Input Ask the user to paste: headline, about section, current role and the last two experience entries, plus whether they have a banner and featured section. A screenshot of the top card is enough for the first pass. Do not log into LinkedIn on their behalf. ## Score it Read `rubric.json` in this folder. Twelve items, 100 points, each with what full marks looks like. Score every item, show the table, and give the total. Be honest - most profiles land in the 30s and 40s on the first pass, and a generous score is useless. ``` PROFILE SCORE 41/100 headline 3/12 job title only, no outcome, no audience about first 2 lines 2/10 opens with "passionate about" about body 4/10 history, not offer featured 0/8 empty banner 0/6 default blue ... ``` ## Then rewrite, in this order Fix in descending order of points lost. Do not rewrite everything at once - the user has to actually paste each of these in. **1. Headline (220 characters).** The formula that works: `{what you do for whom} | {proof} | {how to start}`. Not your job title. Not "Helping X do Y" as the first three words, which every second profile now opens with. Give three options. **2. About, first two lines.** Everything after line 2 is behind "see more" on mobile, so those two lines are the whole about section for most readers. They must state who you help and what changes. No "passionate", no "results-driven", no third-person bio, no opening with your own name. **3. About body.** Written to one reader, in the second person. Structure: the problem they have, what you do about it, one piece of proof with a number, what to do next. Under 1,400 characters even though the limit is 2,600. **4. Featured.** Three items: the best post, the proof asset, the way to contact. An empty featured section is eight points and the only place on the profile you fully control. **5. Experience.** Each role gets one line of scope and two to three bullets that are outcomes with numbers, not duties. Cut anything older than ten years to a single line. **6. Banner.** One sentence of positioning and one way to reach you. The default blue gradient is the clearest signal on the page that nobody is home. ## Output Score table, then the rewrites as copy-ready blocks in fix-first order, each one already run through `/li-human`. Re-score at the end and show the delta honestly - if the rewrite gets to 88 and not 98, say 88, and say what the remaining points need (usually recommendations, a real banner and posting history, none of which a rewrite can create). Nothing is saved to LinkedIn by this skill. The user pastes each section in. ## rubric.json ```json { "version": "1.0", "total": 100, "note": "Twelve items. Score each honestly - a generous score helps nobody. Most first-pass profiles land in the 30s and 40s.", "items": [ { "id": "headline", "points": 12, "full_marks": "States who you help and what changes for them, carries one piece of proof, and is not the job title. Uses the 220 characters, not 60." }, { "id": "about_open", "points": 10, "full_marks": "First two lines - everything visible before 'see more' - name the reader's problem. No 'passionate about', no third-person bio, no opening with your own name." }, { "id": "about_body", "points": 10, "full_marks": "Written to one person in second person: their problem, what you do, one number as proof, what to do next. Under 1,400 characters." }, { "id": "featured", "points": 8, "full_marks": "Three items: best-performing post, a proof asset, and the way to contact you. Nothing empty, nothing stale." }, { "id": "banner", "points": 6, "full_marks": "One line of positioning and one way to reach you. Not the default gradient, not a stock skyline." }, { "id": "photo", "points": 6, "full_marks": "Face fills roughly 60% of the frame, eyes visible, shot in the last two years, background not distracting." }, { "id": "current_role", "points": 10, "full_marks": "One line of scope, then two to three outcome bullets with numbers. Duties are not outcomes." }, { "id": "experience_depth", "points": 8, "full_marks": "Last two roles detailed, everything older than ten years compressed to a single line each." }, { "id": "skills", "points": 6, "full_marks": "Top three skills are the three you want to be hired for and are endorsed. The other 47 are noise." }, { "id": "recommendations", "points": 8, "full_marks": "At least three received in the last two years, each naming a specific outcome rather than character." }, { "id": "activity", "points": 10, "full_marks": "Posted or commented in the last seven days. An empty activity feed reads as an abandoned profile." }, { "id": "contact", "points": 6, "full_marks": "Custom URL, a working email or booking link in contact info, and the same handle as your other platforms." } ] } ```